Percentage returns do not add directly
Starting with USD 10,000:- a 10% gain produces USD 11,000;
- a second 10% gain produces USD 12,100;
- total gain is 21%, not 20%.
Loss and recovery
If (d) is the drawdown fraction, the gain required to recover is: d ÷ (1 − d) This is why a 20% loss requires a 25% gain and a 50% loss requires a 100% gain.Position sizing determines the compounding path
- Fixed-percentage sizing reduces the currency amount at risk after losses and increases it after gains.
- Fixed monetary risk becomes a larger percentage of equity after losses.
- Aggressive fractions increase both growth potential and drawdown.
- Correlated positions can make the effective fraction much larger than the per-trade setting.
Arithmetic vs geometric return
The arithmetic average of periodic returns can be positive while compounded wealth declines. For example, +50% followed by −50% has an arithmetic average of 0%, but capital becomes (1.5 × 0.5 = 0.75), a 25% loss. The gap between arithmetic and geometric outcomes grows with volatility.Prop-account implications
A prop account may terminate at an intermediate drawdown threshold, so terminal compounded return is not the only objective. A position-sizing policy must keep plausible paths inside daily and maximum-loss rules. The correct compounding base may also differ from nominal account balance. When the usable loss buffer is much smaller, a seemingly modest percentage of nominal equity can consume a large part of the actual risk capacity.Drawdown mathematics
Calculate recovery requirements.
Fixed vs percentage risk
Compare compounding behavior across models.
Risking 1% vs 5%
See how the fraction changes an adverse path.
Prop risk framework
Size from the usable loss buffer.