Skip to main content

Direct Answer

The risk-reward ratio compares how much you risk on a trade to how much you aim to gain, but its real importance lies in how it interacts with win rate to determine overall profitability (expectancy).

In Simple Terms

Risk-reward is not about having “big wins.”
It’s about structuring trades so that your gains and losses work together over time to produce profit.

Quick Breakdown

  • Risk-reward = potential loss vs potential gain
  • Must be combined with win rate
  • Higher reward can offset lower win rate
  • Balance matters more than extremes

What Is Risk-Reward Ratio?

Risk-reward ratio defines:
How much you are willing to lose compared to how much you expect to gain on a trade.
Examples:
  • 1:1 → risk 100tomake100 to make 100
  • 1:2 → risk 100tomake100 to make 200
  • 1:3 → risk 100tomake100 to make 300

The Basic View (and Its Limitation)

Many traders believe:
“Higher risk-reward is always better”
This is incomplete. A higher reward target often means:
  • Lower win rate
  • More losing trades
So risk-reward alone does not determine profitability.

The Real Relationship: Risk-Reward + Win Rate

Profitability depends on how risk-reward interacts with win rate. Examples:

System A

  • Risk-reward: 1:1
  • Win rate: 60%
    → Profitable

System B

  • Risk-reward: 1:3
  • Win rate: 30%
    → Can still be profitable

System C

  • Risk-reward: 1:3
  • Win rate: 10%
    → Likely unprofitable

👉 The key is balance—not extremes.

Why “High Reward” Strategies Can Fail

Very high risk-reward ratios (e.g., 1:5 or 1:10) often lead to:
  • Very low win rates
  • Long losing streaks
  • Psychological pressure
  • Inconsistent execution
Even if mathematically valid, they are hard to sustain in practice.

Why “Low Reward” Strategies Can Fail

Low risk-reward ratios (e.g., 1:0.5) require:
  • Very high win rates
  • Tight control of losses
A few large losses can erase many small gains.

The Practical Approach

Instead of chasing extremes:
  • Choose a risk-reward that fits your strategy
  • Ensure it produces positive expectancy
  • Keep risk consistent
  • Focus on execution

Example

Two traders:

Trader A

  • Risk-reward: 1:1
  • Win rate: 55%
    → Stable growth

Trader B

  • Risk-reward: 1:3
  • Win rate: 35%
    → Also profitable
Different structures—both valid.

Common Mistakes

  • Focusing only on reward size
  • Ignoring win rate
  • Changing targets frequently
  • Using unrealistic profit targets

Key Insight

Risk-reward is not a standalone metric.
It only matters in how it contributes to overall expectancy.

Next Step

To understand how these elements combine into profitability: → What Is Expectancy in Trading?