Skip to main content
Position sizing is the process of converting an allowed monetary loss and a trade’s invalidation distance into the number of units, shares, lots, or contracts to trade. For a simple stop-based position: position size = money at risk ÷ loss per unit at the stop The calculation must use the instrument’s contract specification and account for currency conversion and trading costs.

Worked example

A trader allows a USD 120 planned loss. The distance from entry to stop represents a USD 3 loss per share. Position size = USD 120 ÷ USD 3 = 40 shares If estimated round-trip costs and slippage are USD 0.20 per share, the economic loss per share is closer to USD 3.20. A conservative size is: USD 120 ÷ USD 3.20 = 37.5 shares The trader would round down to a valid order size, not up.

Inputs by instrument

For products with nonlinear payoffs or no reliable stop execution, a simple entry-to-stop calculation may be insufficient.

Position size is not total account risk

After sizing one trade, check:
  • existing positions and pending orders;
  • positions that share a currency, sector, index, or catalyst;
  • risk per trade idea;
  • daily and maximum-loss capacity;
  • whether the order can gap or slip beyond its stop;
  • the effect of several strategies trading the same account.
The correct stand-alone size can still be too large at the portfolio level.

Common errors

  • using a fixed lot size across different stop distances;
  • confusing margin requirement with maximum loss;
  • using nominal prop-account balance instead of available loss capacity;
  • omitting spread, commission, or currency conversion;
  • rounding up;
  • assuming a stop guarantees the exit price;
  • changing the stop after entry without recalculating exposure.

How much should you risk?

Decide the monetary risk budget first.

Position sizing models

Compare fixed, percentage, volatility, and Kelly methods.

Risk per trade idea

Aggregate several positions under one thesis.

EmoGuardian

Review automated position and exposure controls.
Stop-based loss is an estimate. Gaps, slippage, liquidity, rejected orders, and platform failures can produce a larger realized loss.